ArticleKidney international reports2026
Clinical Equipoise and Unimproved Outcomes following Posttransplant Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The First Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Kidney Transplantation: A Sentinel Event.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the most common malignancy following solid organ transplantation. Historical data suggest that 25% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) develop additional CSCC within a year of their first lesion, with significantly increased risks of metastasis and mortality. However, contemporary outcomes and optimal secondary prevention strategies remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 8 UK transplant centers, identifying 136 KTRs diagnosed with first-ever CSCC between 2016 and 2020. Results: Over a median follow-up of 39 months, 48.5% developed further CSCC, and 23.3% died, most commonly from malignancy. Poor outcomes were confirmed in another, international cohort. Management varied within and between UK centers and 28.7% underwent immunosuppression reduction, though specific approaches were inconsistent. Distinct clinical and histopathological features were associated with recurrence risk and poorer outcomes, including multiple index lesions, high-risk histopathology, and current smoking. Conclusion: These findings confirm that contemporary post-CSCC outcomes remain unchanged from historic outcomes, despite advances in transplant care. The variability in management after first CSCC highlights the need for prospective studies to define effective interventions for secondary prevention. Importantly, we identify important clinical features present at first CSCC that may guide the targeting of such interventions to the highest risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.