ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Penicillin allergy testing in pregnancy improves maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Penicillin allergy is commonly reported in pregnancy, a time of high antibiotic utilization wherein β-lactam antibiotics have multiple indications. Unverified penicillin allergy leads to alternative antibiotic receipt and is associated with increased rates of cesarean delivery, prolonged maternal hospitalization, increased infectious complications, and increased number of antibiotics courses, while neonates born to those with penicillin allergy have higher infection rates, hospitalization time, and readmissions. Objective: Our primary aim was to evaluate the impact of penicillin allergy evaluation on antibiotic utilization through 30 days postpartum. Our secondary aim was to compare maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes to those who did not undergo penicillin allergy evaluation (usual care group). Methods: Participants in this prospective cohort study underwent single outpatient visit for penicillin allergy evaluation with supervised drug challenge to amoxicillin after negative skin prick and intradermal skin testing during second or third trimester. Antibiotic utilization, length of stay, and other outcomes for mother and infant were compared to a usual care group by linear regression models. Results: Forty-six participants completed outpatient penicillin allergy evaluation. Compared to 105 pregnant patients in the usual care group, tested individuals were more likely to be married and to have private insurance, and they had significantly increased perinatal β-lactam receipt (96% vs 38%, Conclusions: Proactive penicillin allergy evaluation during pregnancy benefits both maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes and is safe to perform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.