ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Multimodal data-driven prediction of postoperative recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by high postoperative recurrence rates and poor long-term survival despite advances in surgical and systemic therapies. Accurate prediction of postoperative recurrence and survival risk is critical for individualized surveillance, adjuvant treatment selection, and precision management. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and medical informatics, multimodal data-driven models integrating clinical, imaging, pathological, and omics information have emerged as a promising paradigm. This narrative review aims to systematically summarize recent advances in multimodal prediction models for postoperative recurrence and survival in HCC, compare modeling strategies and fusion approaches, and discuss current challenges and future directions for clinical translation. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2020 and 2025. Articles focusing on postoperative recurrence or survival prediction in HCC using single-modal or multimodal data were included. Relevant studies were identified using keywords related to HCC, multimodal data, AI, machine learning, deep learning, recurrence, and prognosis. Key Content and Findings: This review summarizes commonly used data modalities, including clinical variables, medical imaging, pathological features, and multi-omics data, and outlines their respective strengths and limitations. Conventional statistical models and AI-based approaches, including non-deep learning and deep learning algorithms, are compared. Particular emphasis is placed on multimodal fusion strategies at the feature level and decision level, with discussion of their methodological characteristics and suitable clinical scenarios. Overall, multimodal models consistently demonstrate superior predictive performance compared with single-modality approaches. However, key challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, limited interpretability of complex models, insufficient external validation, and the predominance of static baseline modeling. Conclusions: Multimodal data-driven prediction models represent a promising strategy for improving postoperative risk stratification and personalized management in HCC. While current evidence highlights their potential advantages over traditional prognostic tools, broader clinical adoption is hindered by methodological limitations and a lack of standardized frameworks. Future research should focus on longitudinal multimodal modeling, multi-center prospective validation, and enhanced model interpretability to facilitate integration into clinical workflows and inform precision oncology-oriented decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.