Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169824›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2015

Scientific Opinion on a continuous multiple-step catalytic hydro-treatment for the processing of rendered animal fat (Category 1).

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An alternative method for the treatment of rendered animal fat (Category 1) intended for the production of renewable fuels by a continuous multi-step catalytic hydro-treatment process was assessed. The alternative method is based on a pre-treatment by degumming and bleaching followed by a hydro-treatment comprising three main processes: catalytic hydro-treatment, stripping and isomerisation. The minimum processing conditions are pressure 30 bar, temperature 265°C and retention time 20 minutes. Based on the outcome of previous EFSA Opinions and the expert evaluation, the BIOHAZ Panel considered that a reduction of six log

Indexed as

animal fatcategory 1hydro‐treatmentrenderingTSE

Identifiers

PMID42169824
PMCPMC13189474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.