Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169807›Full record

ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026

Systematic Review of Large Language Models and Natural Language Processing in Stroke Care: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Kaue Tartarotti Nepomuceno Duarte, Abhijot Singh Sidhu, Maya Bakshi, Murilo Costa de Barros, Brij Karmur, Taha Aslan, Donghao Zhang, Mohamed AlShamrani, Wu Qiu, Bijoy K Menon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kaue Tartarotti Nepomuceno DuarteDepartments of Clinical Neuroscience and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cummings School of Medicine (K.T.N.D., B.K., B.K.M.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4074-3672
Abhijot Singh SidhuGraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, Department of Radiology (A.S.S.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4839-9466
Maya BakshiDepartment of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (M.B.).
Murilo Costa de BarrosSchool of Technology, University of Campinas, Limeira, Brazil (M.C.B.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2452-8128
Brij KarmurDepartments of Clinical Neuroscience and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cummings School of Medicine (K.T.N.D., B.K., B.K.M.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-173X
Taha AslanCalgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre (T.A., M.A., B.K.M.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2768-5105
Donghao ZhangCollege of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (D.Z., W.Q.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8185-7577
Mohamed AlShamraniCalgary Stroke Program, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Medical Centre (T.A., M.A., B.K.M.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3009-0537
Wu QiuCollege of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (D.Z., W.Q.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-8270
Bijoy K MenonDepartments of Clinical Neuroscience and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cummings School of Medicine (K.T.N.D., B.K., B.K.M.), University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3466-496X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke, a leading cause of mortality, manifests as ischemic (87%) or hemorrhagic (13%), demanding rapid intervention to mitigate irreversible damage. Despite advances in artificial intelligence, systematic reviews addressing the integration of large language models and natural language processing into clinical stroke care remain limited. Such a review is critical given large language models' potential to overcome traditional natural language processing limitations, thereby enhancing risk prediction and decision support. We proposed a systematic review aimed to comprehensively analyze applications in stroke care. After searching 6 databases, 2991 records were screened, yielding 65 eligible studies. Results were structured quantitatively (impact factor trends, publication distribution) and qualitatively across 4 dimensions: Study Purposes (eg, risk modeling, decision support), Data Sets/Key Findings, Limitations, and Future Directions. Large language models demonstrated strong capabilities in automated data extraction from clinical notes (accuracies of 93.5%-95.1%) and report summarization. However, majority of studies (94%) lacked external validation. Most were limited by single-center, retrospective designs (62%) and used private data sets (85%), raising concerns about generalizability. Common failure modes included model hallucinations, performance degradation on external data, and infrastructural barriers to clinical integration. Future efforts must prioritize multicenter, prospective validation (82% of studies) to ensure model robustness and generalizability across diverse populations. Pathways for clinical translation include developing interpretability techniques to build clinician trust. Technical refinements for hallucination mitigation (98% of studies) and real-time integration of multimodal data are necessary to enhance predictive power. Addressing data heterogeneity and ethical concerns remains as gaps. This review highlights the potential of large language models in stroke care, encompassing tasks from risk prediction to workflow automation. Realizing this potential requires a shift from proof-of-concept studies to rigorously validated, clinically integrated systems. The field demands scalable, equitable, and transparent artificial intelligence solutions that are codeveloped with clinicians. These are needed to overcome existing methodological and translational barriers.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningnatural language processingstrokesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42169807
PMCPMC13189582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.