ReviewJournal of human immunity2025
Ethical and equitable considerations when establishing a diagnosis of an inborn error of immunity.
Review in Journal of human immunity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a heterogeneous group of disorders, inborn errors of immunity have a variety of diagnostic and management approaches. Clinical immunologists regularly encounter ethical and equitable dilemmas when caring for this population. While some of these predicaments are similar to any person with a chronic condition, there are additional unique challenges faced by those with an inborn error of immunity. Advances in genetic testing have improved the ability to provide precise medical care, and simultaneously they have forced clinical immunologists to contemplate the ethical and equitable consequences of this testing. As diagnostic modalities and therapeutics continue to advance, new ethical and equitable dilemmas will arise. An understanding of medical ethics by clinical immunologists is fundamental for providing patient-centered medical care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.