ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Analysis of Career Outcomes and Practice Patterns After Microsurgery Fellowship.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Microsurgery fellowships provide advanced training in reconstructive procedures; career trajectories and practice patterns postfellowship are not well studied. Understanding these outcomes may be helpful for residents and training programs. Methods: Microsurgery fellowship graduates were identified from 1990 to 2023. First position, current position, and practice types after fellowship were determined. Fellow characteristics included sex, fellowship region, advanced degrees, additional training, bibliometric indices, and time to practice changes. Residency characteristics (residency type, association with a fellowship program, top-ranked program, affiliation with top-ranked research institution) were also analyzed. Fellows were compared based on initial job setting (academic versus private practice [PP]), transitions between practice types, and practice of microsurgery. Results: Over 33 years, 416 fellows were analyzed. Of the graduates, 55% began in academia. Fellows in the Southwest were more likely to accept academic positions, whereas those in the Northeast, Midwest, and West were more likely to accept PP positions ( Conclusions: Approximately half of former fellows hold academic positions. Fellowship location and h-index were associated with employment setting. About one-fifth of those in academic jobs transitioned into PP. Despite this attrition, most surgeons continue to perform microsurgical procedures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.