ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
The Keystone Flap for Vulvar Reconstruction: A Case Series and BODY-Q Evaluation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vulvar carcinoma is a rare cancer that mainly affects women older than 60 years of age. The most common form is squamous cell carcinoma. The main treatment is vulvectomy, followed by reconstruction. Among reconstructive techniques, the keystone perforator island flap (KPIF) is a relatively novel solution, offering robust vascularity, minimal complications, and rapid recovery. This study analyzed the use of KPIF on 14 patients after vulvectomy, evaluating the aesthetic and functional results through the BODY-Q questionnaire, which has never been applied to evaluate this reconstruction before. Methods: Patients operated on at the authors' institution between 2016 and 2024 were retrospectively recruited and evaluated. The data collected included demographic and clinical characteristics, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative endpoints, including patient satisfaction assessed through the BODY-Q questionnaire. Results: The study analyzed 14 patients (mean age 74 y). Among them, 86% had vulvar squamous cell carcinoma. The average operating time was 278 minutes, and the mean hospital stay was 11.5 days. Complications were limited, and follow-up showed satisfactory oncological, aesthetic, and functional results. The BODY-Q evaluation showed a very high level of patient satisfaction. Conclusions: This study shows that KPIF is a safe, simple, and reproducible technique for vulvar reconstruction, providing favorable aesthetic and functional results. Compared with other flaps, it offers a more concealed donor site, with scars limited to the perineal area, fewer complications, and the possibility of further advancement in case of recurrence. KPIF is a safe and effective technique, which can therefore be included in the armamentarium of vulvar reconstruction surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.