Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169732›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Novel machine learning fusion architectures integrating electrocardiogram representations: applications to acute coronary event detection.

Rui Qi Ji, Nathan T Riek, Tanmay Gokhale, Zeineb Bouzid, Karina Kraevsky, Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey, Samir Saba, Christian Martin-Gill, Clifton W Callaway, Murat Akcakaya and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rui Qi JiThe Edward S. Rogers Sr, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6626-9793
Nathan T RiekSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3286-560X
Tanmay GokhaleUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9436-2058
Zeineb BouzidSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-4444
Karina KraevskyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2362-7749
Jessica K Zègre-HemseySchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5650-0464
Samir SabaUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-803X
Christian Martin-GillUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3522-2100
Clifton W CallawayUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3309-1573
Murat AkcakayaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-1931
Ervin SejdićThe Edward S. Rogers Sr, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A1, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4987-8298
Salah S Al-ZaitiSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: AI in electrocardiography (ECG) has diverged into two paths: traditional signal processing with machine learning, and deep learning of raw waveforms. The former preserves physiological interpretability but may miss novel patterns, while the latter overlooks a century of ECG science. No framework yet integrates both. This study introduces a fusion model combining handcrafted feature-based random forest and waveform-based convolutional neural network to improve the diagnosis of acute coronary events. Methods and results: This prospective, multicentre cohort study included pre-hospital ECGs recorded on emergency medical services from patients with a chief complaint of chest pain. Using this dataset, we developed four fusion frameworks that integrate ECG features with waveform information: (1) decision-level fusion combining predictions from random forest and convolutional neural network (CNN); (2) decision-level fusion with retraining; (3) feature-level fusion by concatenating CNN embeddings with ECG features; and (4) feature-level fusion combining CNN embeddings with tree-level outputs from the random forest. This study comprised of 10 393 ECGs from 7397 patients. On both outcomes, acute coronary syndrome and occlusion myocardial infarction, the proposed decision fusion with retraining (Approach 2) achieved an AUROC of 0.878 (95% CI, 0.837-0.915) and 0.961 (95% CI, 0.934-0.983) on the test set and an average precision score of 0.749 (95% CI, 0.681-0.810) and 0.850 (95% CI, 0.763-0.918), respectively, outperforming all other proposed fusion and individual models. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the significance of fusion models that integrate complementary ECG representations to improve diagnostic accuracy in acute coronary events, highlighting a promising approach for real-time AI-augmented cardiovascular disease detection across diverse use cases.

Indexed as

Acute coronary eventsDiagnosisElectrocardiogramEmergency department triageFusion learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42169732
PMCPMC13188221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.