Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169723›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2026

Justification of Imaging Referrals: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Referring Physicians' Knowledge, Practices, and Barriers.

Mohamed Abuzaid, Nora Almuqbil, Zuhal Y Hamd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohamed AbuzaidMedical Diagnostic Imaging Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nora AlmuqbilDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zuhal Y HamdDepartment of Radiological Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate referral physician' confidence, practices, and barriers in justifying imaging referrals, with specific focus on the impact of training, workload, and guideline accessibility on referral appropriateness. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 167 referral physicians across various hospitals in the United Arab Emirates. A validated, self-administered questionnaire captured demographic data, referral practices, confidence levels, guideline usage, training participation, and perceived barriers to appropriate imaging justification. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests, including chi-square, Mann-Whitney Results: Although 82% of physicians reported high confidence in assessing imaging necessity, over 60% acknowledged frequent issues with referral quality. More than half (51.5%) admitted that imaging referrals were sometimes unnecessary. Training participation was significantly associated with better guideline accessibility (chi-square=50.50, Conclusions: Despite high self-reported confidence, systemic and educational gaps persist in imaging referral justification. Addressing training needs and improving access to guidelines can enhance appropriateness in clinical imaging decisions.

Indexed as

appropriatenessDiagnostic imagingimaging referral justificationphysicianradiation protection

Identifiers

PMID42169723
PMCPMC13187589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.