ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026
Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) and Atypical Squamous Cells-Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H) in a Low-Income Clinical Setting: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAtypical squamous cells represent a significant category in cervical cytology screening, with a varying degree of malignant potential between ASC-US and ASC-H. In low-resource settings, challenges in follow-up and testing necessitate a clear understanding of the risk associated with these diagnoses.
objectiveTo determine the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for premalignant and malignant cervical lesions (CIN2+) in patients with ASC cytology results, and to evaluate management challenges, particularly the high loss to follow-up, in a low-resource clinical setting.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 276 patients with ASC cytology results from February 2019 to December 2024 at a tertiary care center. Patients were categorized into ASC-US (n=210) and ASC-H (n=66) groups. Demographics, histological outcomes, HPV testing results, and management patterns were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson's Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact Tests. The primary outcome was the PPV for CIN2+ among the 85 (30.8%) patients who underwent histological verification.
resultsAmong 1,360 cervical cytology specimens, ASC prevalence was 20.3% (ASC-US: 15.4%, ASC-H: 4.8%). Biopsy was performed in 30.8% of patients (n=85). The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for CIN2+ was significantly higher for ASC-H compared to ASC-US (ASC-H: 40% [16/40] vs. ASC-US: 4.4% [2/45]; p<0.001). One case of endometrial carcinoma was identified in the ASC-H group but was excluded from the PPV calculation for cervical CIN2+ lesions. HPV testing was performed in only 13.8% of cases, with a 68.4% positivity rate, reflecting significant selection bias. Loss to follow-up (LTFU), defined as no follow-up within 12 months, occurred in 75.7% of all cases.
conclusionsASC-H carries a substantially higher risk for significant cervical pathology compared to ASC-US, supporting differential management approaches. The extremely high rate of loss to follow-up (75.7%), strictly defined as no record of colposcopy, biopsy, or repeat cytology within 12 months of the index ASC finding, is a critical programmatic failure that severely limits the generalizability of these findings and underscores the urgent need for systematic patient tracking, enhanced patient education, and the integration of costeffective screening technologies like self-collection HPV testing to improve patient outcomes in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.