Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169569›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026

Hybrid Modelling of Pulmonary Cancer Risk Prediction Using Classical Algorithms to Modern Machine Learning Techniques.

Seeta Devi, Roshan Yadav, Joyce Robert Mathivanan, Sonopant Joshi, Bhagyashree Jogdeo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seeta DeviSymbiosis College of Nursing (SCON), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6220-7264
Roshan YadavB. Tech. in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Joyce Robert MathivananTutor, Symbiosis College of Nursing (SCON), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Maharashtra, India.
Sonopant JoshiSymbiosis College of Nursing (SCON), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1560-4352
Bhagyashree JogdeoDepartment of Child Health Nursing, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant advancements in oncology, early diagnosis of pulmonary cancer poses a clinical challenge, thus making it a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and a focal point for the development of data-driven prediction models. The objective of the study was to predict pulmonary cancer using hybrid machine learning models.

methodsThis study presents a comprehensive review of machine learning (ML) algorithms to facilitate early prediction of pulmonary carcinoma using electronic medical records (EMRs) data. The dataset comprising 1000 patient records and 25 predictor variables, was subjected to rigorous pre-processing, including label correction, multicollinearity assessment, and dimensionality reduction. Eighteen statistically significant features, encompassing symptoms, lifestyle factors, and environmental exposures were identified through variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis and chi-square testing. Multiple ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Deep Learning (DL) classifiers, were trained and evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and AUC metrics.

resultsThe chi-square test revealed that age (χ²=44.187, p<0.001), passive smoking (χ²=752.960, p<0.001), obesity (χ²=712.088, p<0.001), smoking (χ²=671.006, p<0.001), and symptoms like coughing blood (χ²=818.669, p<0.001) were significantly associated with pulmonary Carcinoma. The performance metrics indicate that most basic and ensemble models, including DT, SVM, LR, KNN, AdaBoost, and RF, achieved perfect scores (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUC = 1.000), demonstrating optimal classification. DL and SVM Bagging showed 97% accuracy, while NN and MLP performed well with accuracy above 96%, though slightly less than the ensemble models.

conclusionThese findings accentuate the potential of ML, especially SVM, for early prediction of pulmonary carcinoma using structured EMR data. These findings support the integration of ML-based tools into clinical workflows, supporting data-driven, personalized cancer screening and decision-making in health care.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningClassification AlgorithmsEarly Detection of CancerElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRisk FactorsSupport Vector MachineDeep LearningEnsembleMachine LearningpredictionPulmonary carcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.