ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026
Hybrid Modelling of Pulmonary Cancer Risk Prediction Using Classical Algorithms to Modern Machine Learning Techniques.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite significant advancements in oncology, early diagnosis of pulmonary cancer poses a clinical challenge, thus making it a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and a focal point for the development of data-driven prediction models. The objective of the study was to predict pulmonary cancer using hybrid machine learning models.
methodsThis study presents a comprehensive review of machine learning (ML) algorithms to facilitate early prediction of pulmonary carcinoma using electronic medical records (EMRs) data. The dataset comprising 1000 patient records and 25 predictor variables, was subjected to rigorous pre-processing, including label correction, multicollinearity assessment, and dimensionality reduction. Eighteen statistically significant features, encompassing symptoms, lifestyle factors, and environmental exposures were identified through variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis and chi-square testing. Multiple ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Deep Learning (DL) classifiers, were trained and evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, specificity, and AUC metrics.
resultsThe chi-square test revealed that age (χ²=44.187, p<0.001), passive smoking (χ²=752.960, p<0.001), obesity (χ²=712.088, p<0.001), smoking (χ²=671.006, p<0.001), and symptoms like coughing blood (χ²=818.669, p<0.001) were significantly associated with pulmonary Carcinoma. The performance metrics indicate that most basic and ensemble models, including DT, SVM, LR, KNN, AdaBoost, and RF, achieved perfect scores (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, AUC = 1.000), demonstrating optimal classification. DL and SVM Bagging showed 97% accuracy, while NN and MLP performed well with accuracy above 96%, though slightly less than the ensemble models.
conclusionThese findings accentuate the potential of ML, especially SVM, for early prediction of pulmonary carcinoma using structured EMR data. These findings support the integration of ML-based tools into clinical workflows, supporting data-driven, personalized cancer screening and decision-making in health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42169569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.