SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026
Corticoids Reduce Incidence of Oral Mucositis during Antineoplastic Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Clinical Trials.
Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral mucositis (OM) is a serious complication of antineoplastic therapy and its clinical presentation can range from small erythematous lesions to large, debilitating ulcerative areas. This adverse effect results from the non-specificity of chemotherapeutic agents. This study aims to determine whether corticosteroid protocols reduce the incidence or severity of OM during antineoplastic treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis PROSPERO registered systematic review (CRD42023442448) searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, EBSCOhost, LIVIVO, Embase, and the gray literature. RoB-2 and ROBINS-I were used to assess the risk of bias (RoB), and a meta-analysis was performed evaluating the incidence or severity of OM. GRADE-pro analyzed the certainty of the evidence.
resultsOf the 1795 articles, 5 RCTs and three n-RCTs were included, involving 718 patients, 255 men and 463 women distributed among 379 patients in the intervention groups and 339 patients in the control groups. High heterogeneity and low publication RoB were identified. The topical application of corticosteroids did not impair OM incidence (p=0.860). However, the systemic application of corticosteroids resulted in a reduction of 0.44 (CI95% = 0.29 to 0.66) times (p<0.001). There is no significant risk of publication bias (p=0.881). In the meta-analysis of OM severity, topical (p=0.280) or systemic (p=0.270) application did not show a significant reduction in the MO scores; there was no significant heterogeneity (p=0.940, I²=0%), and leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that removing individual study results did not alter this outcome. GRADE showed moderate certainty for both OM incidence and severity. Inconsistency and imprecision were low to moderate, and the risk of publication bias was low.
conclusionHigh doses of systemic corticosteroids demonstrate clinical benefits in controlling OM, while the topical use requires further investigation, particularly with high-potency formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.