ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2026
Robotic-Assisted Partial Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasty: First Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRevision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) poses substantial technical challenges. Although robotic assistance has demonstrated efficacy in primary TKA, its application in partial revision procedures remains poorly understood. This study presents a case of robotic-assisted partial rTKA-specifically, isolated tibial component revision using the retained femoral component as a registration reference-and provides a comprehensive review of the current literature. CASE PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old male presented with progressive knee pain 8 years after left TKA. Imaging revealed a well-fixed femoral component but isolated aseptic loosening with posterior tilting of the tibial component. Given the stability of the femoral component, a robotic-assisted partial revision targeting only the tibial component was performed. The robotic system was registered intraoperatively using the well-fixed retained femoral component as the primary reference, enabling accurate spatial orientation despite the altered tibial anatomy. A critical prerequisite for this procedure was implant compatibility between the retained Triathlon femoral component and the planned Triathlon TS revision system. After removal of the loose tibial tray and debridement, robotic-arm guidance was used for precise tibial osteotomy with a 10 mm augment. Postoperative imaging confirmed optimal component positioning. The patient achieved 0°-130° range of motion within 2 weeks, with favorable short-term clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year follow-up.
conclusionThis case demonstrates the technical feasibility of robotic-assisted partial TKA revision, with favorable short-term clinical and radiological outcomes at 1 year follow-up. The technique enabled precise osteotomy, balanced gap restoration, and preservation of the well-fixed femoral component. While these preliminary results are encouraging, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to establish comparative effectiveness and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.