ArticleBiotechnology progress
Machine learning-assisted clone selection for intensified cell culture processes.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensified fed-batch processes are becoming increasingly prevalent among biomanufacturers due to their superior space-time yields relative to traditional, non-intensified fed-batch processes. However, the shift towards intensified manufacturing has unexpectedly made optimal clone selection more challenging. Clone selection, traditionally an empirical screening of candidates on the basis of productivity, has been complicated by the observation that clonal productivity rankings can vary substantially between intensified and non-intensified processes. In the absence of a small-scale intensified empirical screen, clones destined for intensified manufacturing are selected based on their performance in the non-intensified process. This mismatch risks selection of suboptimal clones, representing a missed opportunity to generate additional product at no extra cost. This study presents a machine learning approach to improve clone selection for intensified processes by predicting and ranking clonal productivity. Models were trained on non-intensified clone performance data routinely collected during cell line development to facilitate seamless integration into existing capabilities. To evaluate generalizability and simulate real-world application, independent clone panels expressing two distinct monoclonal antibodies were withheld from model training and used in comparative testing against the legacy clone selection method. The ranking model identified the most productive clone of those expressing the first mAb, representing a 68.5% higher titer than the clone selected by the legacy method. For the second mAb, the ranking model identified the second most productive clone, resulting in a marginally lower titer. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning models as practical tools for improving the selection of high productivity clones in intensified bioprocessing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.