ArticleThe plant genome2026
Genome-wide association and genomic prediction of anthracnose (Colletotrichum dematium) resistance in spinach.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome-wide association and genomic prediction of anthracnose (Colletotrichum dematium) resistance in spinach.The plant genome · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum dematium, has emerged as a major foliar disease that threatens spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) production. In this study, a diverse panel of 266 accessions was evaluated under field conditions to dissect the genetic architecture of anthracnose resistance. Substantial phenotypic variation was observed, with disease severity indices (DSIs) ranging from 1 (highly resistant) to 10 (highly susceptible). A total of 20 accessions showed moderate to high resistance (DSI ≤ 4), representing valuable resistance sources. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified 20 significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The most consistent marker (SOVchr3_19667279) explained up to 66.8% of phenotypic variance, and several associated SNPs were located within or near putative defense-related genes. Genomic prediction (GP) using multiple models demonstrated that predictive accuracy increased when a set with more SNPs was used. The genomic best linear unbiased prediction model achieved the highest accuracy (r = 0.92), while the Bayesian ridge regression model attained the best predictive accuracy (r = 0.51) when using 20 GWAS-derived SNPs, highlighting the value of integrating association mapping with prediction approaches. Cross-population prediction performed well (r = 0.58-0.71), whereas across-population prediction showed reduced accuracy (r = 0.10-0.14), indicating the influence of genetic background on model transferability. This integrative genomic study provides novel insights into the genetic basis of anthracnose resistance in spinach and demonstrates the potential of GWAS and GP in accelerating resistance breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.