Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169449›Full record

Trial reportTransfusion2026

Next generation spray-dried on-demand plasma: A multicenter, randomized, dose-escalation, first-in-human safety study.

Jose A Cancelas, Lisa Buckley, Susan F Leitman, Shawnagay Nestheide, Lindsay Gingras, Dawn Munoz, Angela Treml, Stephanie Post, Mamie Thant, Caroline Alquist and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jose A CancelasConnell and O'Reilly Families Cell Manipulation Core Facility, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lisa BuckleyVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.
Susan F LeitmanVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.
Shawnagay NestheideHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Lindsay GingrasVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.
Dawn MunozSpaulding Clinical Research, West Bend, Wisconsin, USA.
Angela TremlVersiti Blood Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-736X
Stephanie PostSpaulding Clinical Research, West Bend, Wisconsin, USA.
Mamie ThantHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Caroline AlquistHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Jihae SohnVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.
Neeta RuggHoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Andrew P CapVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-0597
Mark A PopovskyVelico Medical, Beverly, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority 75A50121C000059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital plasma transfusion for patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock reduces mortality, but cold-chain and logistical constraints limit product availability. This study reports the first-in-human clinical evaluation of a new spray-dried plasma product, Frontline On-Demand Plasma (ODP).

methodsTwenty-four healthy volunteers were sequentially enrolled into three dose-escalation cohorts. Autologous apheresis plasma was processed into plasma frozen within 24 h (PF24), with half of each collection manufactured into ODP. Cohort 1 (n = 6) received 200 mL ODP; Cohort 2 (n = 6) received 400 mL; and Cohort 3 (n = 12) was a randomized, double-blind crossover comparing 800 mL ODP with 800 mL PF24. Subjects were monitored for 28 days after each infusion. The primary endpoint was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

resultsSystem verification data demonstrated preservation of protein content in spray-dried plasma. All 24 participants completed the study and infusions were well tolerated. Thirty-five TEAEs occurred in 18 subjects; 34 were unrelated or unlikely related to infusion. In Cohort 3, TEAEs occurred at similar frequencies after ODP and PF24. Headache was the most common TEAE. Minor coagulation parameter changes were observed but were not clinically significant. Out-of-range coagulation values were evenly distributed between treatment groups.

conclusionsSpray-dried plasma demonstrated a safety profile comparable to standard frozen plasma, with no thromboembolic events observed. Its durable plastic packaging and rapid reconstitution support its potential for widespread use in out-of-hospital care, including emergency and austere environments.

Indexed as

Blood Component TransfusionPlasmaSpray DryingAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultcoagulationhemorrhagesafety trialspray‐dried plasmatrauma resuscitation

Identifiers

PMID42169449
PMCPMC13452627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.