Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169401›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026

Breastfeeding Experiences of Aboriginal Women With Child Protection Involvement: A Qualitative Study.

Amanda L Peek, Sharynne L Hamilton, Natasha Jojo, Marjorie Atchan, Karel Williams, Holly Northam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda L PeekSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-1614-8937
Sharynne L HamiltonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3057-8992
Natasha JojoFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-7709
Marjorie AtchanFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2386-8457
Karel WilliamsFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2743-7785
Holly NorthamSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4690-3999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rates of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander infant removal are disproportionately rising, affecting mother-infant attachment, disrupting breastfeeding and preventing infants' access to optimal nutrition. This significantly contributes to negative long-term health and wellbeing outcomes of children. Operating at the intersection of midwifery care and child protection services presents an ethical dilemma for midwives, who are required to provide culturally safe and respectful care while working with women during the perinatal period. The aim of this article is to present the exploration of breastfeeding experiences of Aboriginal women, in the Australian Capital Territory, in the context of a child protection intervention or child removal. Using an Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach, data were collected using a social and research-topic yarning method, with five Aboriginal women. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic network analysis and then reanalysed through an interpretivist lens to present the data as vignettes. Women who had child protection involvement reported a lack of breastfeeding support from midwives and nurses that resulted in disrupted and unsupported breastfeeding. The women's involvement with child protection services led to experiences of stigma, oppressive practices and judgemental attitudes from midwives and nurses, that are evidence of professional breaches which impacted the mothers and infants' ability to benefit from breastfeeding. These findings point to the urgent need for midwives, nurses, and child protection workers to 1. Be accountable to work in culturally safe ways; 2. To privilege breastfeeding and 3. Provide supports to empower women to breastfeed to enable infants to have the 'best start in life' for an equitable future. Restorative approaches are proposed as a way forward to address these relational harms.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingChild Protective ServicesAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesAustralian Capital TerritoryCulturally Competent CareFemaleHumansInfantMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyMothersNursesSocial StigmaAboriginal womenbreastfeedingchild protectioncultural safetyethical dilemmaMidwiferyrestorative approachesstigma

Identifiers

PMID42169401
PMCPMC13205708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.