Trial reportMaternal & child nutrition2026
Understanding Opportunity Costs of Women Participating in Maternal and Child Nutrition Interventions in Southern Angola: Evidence From the MuCCUA Trial.
Trial report in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05571280 (Maternal and Child Interventions Against Chronic Malnutrition in Angola. A Cluster-randomized Cost-effectiveness Community-based Study.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Maternal and Child Interventions Against Chronic Malnutrition in Angola. A Cluster-randomized Cost-effectiveness Community-based Study.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stunting remains highly prevalent in Angola. Multisectoral interventions are essential to prevent this public health issue, and while economic evaluations have assessed the costs and consequences of these interventions, they have largely overlooked costs incurred by participants. The MuCCUA trial evaluates the cost-effectiveness of three interventions to prevent stunting during the first 1000 days: standard of care (SOC), SOC plus nutritional supplementation (SOC + NS), and SOC plus cash transfers (SOC + CT). This study aimed to estimate participants' opportunity costs and to explore women's experiences. After 12 months of implementation, data were collected from participant women through focus group discussions, interviews and questionnaires on travel and waiting times, and transport costs for attending health posts and community sessions in the SOC arm, and for quarterly distribution visits in the SOC + NS and SOC + CT arms. Total opportunity costs per participant were estimated by intervention arm and community category (close/far from services and/or distribution points). The total opportunity cost of participants over 1 year were US$9373.91 for SOC, US$16,142.09 for SOC + NS and US$18,231.38 for SOC + CT, corresponding to US$1.69, US$2.80 and US$3.17 per participant per month respectively. Value of travel and waiting times accounted for 75%-85% of opportunity costs, with women in remote villages facing substantially higher burdens. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for opportunity costs, especially time and geographic accessibility, when designing maternal and child health and nutrition interventions. Incorporating a societal perspective in economic evaluations is essential to capture unintended participant burdens and promote equitable, effective participation. Trial Registration: NCT05571280. Registered 7 October 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.