Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169246›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026

KEGG Syntax for comparison of organisms, organism groups, and viruses by conserved gene repertoires.

Minoru Kanehisa, Yoko Sato

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minoru KanehisaInstitute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoko SatoPathway Solutions Inc., Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJND2203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The KEGG Orthology (KO) system has been used as a basic framework of the KEGG database for linking genes in the genome to pathways and other molecular networks. KOs are manually defined orthologs representing conserved genes with relevance to molecular and higher-level functions. Here, the KO system is used to define genomic features, including the gene content by the composition of KOs and the gene order on the chromosome by the sequence of KOs, and to compare organisms, organism groups and viruses according to the similarity of KO compositions and KO sequences. The compositions of KEGG modules, manually defined functional sets of KOs, and VOGs, computationally derived ortholog groups for viruses, are also used as genomic features. The similarity analysis of organism groups by KO compositions has revealed a close relationship of Bacteria and Archaea, which differs from the three domains of life in evolution, but which is likely to reflect similarity of metabolic and other cellular functions represented by KOs. A collection of tools is named KEGG Syntax (https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/syntax/) and can be used to analyze the user's data as well as the genomes already registered in KEGG.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaDatabases, GeneticVirusesConserved Sequenceconserved syntenygenome alignmentKEGG moduleKEGG Orthologytaxonomy mapping

Identifiers

PMID42169246
PMCPMC13240002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.