Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169210›Full record

ArticleImplementation science communications2026

Cultural adaptation of compensatory cognitive training for Nigerian mental health services: a participatory approach balancing fidelity and contextual fit.

Olabisi E Oladipo, Abiodun O Adewuya, Bolanle A Ola, Adeniran Okewole, Ayantunde Ayankola, Arit Esangbedo, Azizat Lebimoyo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olabisi E OladipoLagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Abiodun O AdewuyaLagos State University College of Medicine, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria. abiodun.adewuya@lasucom.edu.ng.
Bolanle A OlaGriffith University and Toowoomba Hospital - Darling Downs Health, Toowoomba, Australia.
Adeniran OkewoleNeuropsychiatric Hospital Aro, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Ayantunde AyankolaNeuropsychiatric Hospital Aro, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Arit EsangbedoFederal Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Azizat LebimoyoLagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust, UK 226720/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive impairment substantially constrains functional recovery in psychosis, persisting despite adequate symptom control. Although Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) demonstrates efficacy in high-income contexts, its direct transfer to resource-constrained settings encounters multiple barriers: linguistic complexity, cultural distance, extended session requirements, and specialist workforce dependencies. This study documents a systematic cultural adaptation process through which CCT was reconfigured for Nigerian mental health services whilst preserving core therapeutic mechanisms.

methodsA ten-day participatory workshop convened 28 multistakeholder participants (clinicians, researchers, service users, implementation scientists, designers, and language specialists) organised into four interlinked committees. The adaptation drew upon layered theoretical frameworks, including the Ecological Validity Framework, Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced, and principles balancing fidelity against contextual responsiveness. Modified Delphi procedures (80% consensus threshold) governed decisions according to hierarchical criteria: preserve cognitive principles, enhance accessibility, ensure feasibility. Post-adaptation assessment employed a five-domain fidelity matrix examining core model preservation, content validity, structural integrity, cultural fit, and implementation feasibility. Independent stakeholder validation involved both service users (n = 10) and mental health providers (n = 13) who had not participated in the adaptation process.

resultsThe adapted twelve-session Nigerian CCT manuals retained all five cognitive domains and compensatory philosophy whilst incorporating extensive modifications: linguistic simplification with strategic Nigerian Pidgin integration, contextually grounded examples reflecting Nigerian daily life, session condensation (90-120 min to 60 min), complete visual redesign, and comprehensive task-shifting supports. Fidelity assessment suggested strong preservation of essential intervention features (overall M = 4.76/5.0). Stakeholder validation yielded exceptional ratings for language clarity (M = 4.9/5.0), cultural relevance (M = 4.9/5.0), and acceptability (M = 4.8/5.0). All service users expressed willingness to participate; 92% of providers endorsed sixty-minute session deliverability. Implementation barriers appeared predominantly structural, concerning space (54%) and staffing (46%), rather than content-related.

conclusionsTheory-informed participatory adaptation appears capable of preserving intervention fidelity whilst enhancing both cultural appropriateness and implementation feasibility. The adapted CCT-Nigeria materials demonstrate content readiness for pilot implementation, though successful scale-up will likely require health system strengthening that addresses infrastructure, workforce capacity, and resource constraints. This methodology may offer a replicable framework for complex intervention adaptation across resource-constrained settings.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentCompensatory cognitive trainingCultural adaptationFidelityImplementation scienceMental health servicesNigeriaParticipatory methodsPsychosisTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID42169210
PMCPMC13383451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.