ArticleTropical medicine and health2026
Formal compliance versus functional access to diagnostics in the PhilHealth primary care benefit package: a glimpse into a rural health unit in the Philippines.
Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- National Essential Diagnostics List development as an opportunity to expand frontline diagnostic testing at barangay health stations in the Philippines.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to essential diagnostic services is a key component of effective primary health care and universal health coverage. In the Philippines, the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) has introduced a primary care benefit package, the Yaman ng Kalusugan Program (YAKAP), which provides capitation-based payments to accredited providers to deliver a defined set of primary care services. Under this scheme, providers are required to offer a set of 15 laboratory and diagnostic tests. However, many primary care facilities, particularly rural health units (RHUs) managed by local government units (LGUs), operate with limited laboratory infrastructure and human resources. This correspondence describes a case from an RHU in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR) serving approximately 16,000 people. Of the 15 diagnostic tests required under the YAKAP package, nine are provided through memoranda of agreement with external laboratories located in other municipalities rather than being performed on-site. Patients referred for these diagnostic tests are required to travel approximately one to two and a half hours and incur out-of-pocket transportation costs of about 700 Philippine pesos (US$ 12) per round trip.While such arrangements allow facilities to meet accreditation requirements, they may not ensure timely and affordable access to diagnostics for patients. Strengthening diagnostic capacity within primary care facilities is, therefore, critical. Increasing awareness among LGUs of the importance of diagnostics in PHC may encourage greater investment in laboratory services. In addition, the development of a National Essential Diagnostics List could help clarify which tests should be available at primary care facilities and guide prioritized resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.