Trial reportScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2026
Effect of optimal operator positioning on transcranial Doppler acquisition: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundErgonomic conditions during ultrasound procedures may influence both acquisition time and image quality. In transcranial Doppler, positioning at the patient's head could improve operator comfort and performance. This study aimed to evaluate whether a standardized seated position at the patient's head enables faster acquisition of interpretable images and could improve image quality.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial between August and December 2024 including emergency medicine residents without prior training in transcranial Doppler. Participants were randomized to either a free positioning group or a standardized seated position at the patient's head. Each participant performed bilateral acquisitions of the middle cerebral artery. Acquisition time was recorded, and image quality was assessed blindly by an expert panel using a semi-quantitative scale.
resultsForty-four residents were included, yielding 88 measurements (46 in the intervention group and 42 in the control group). Baseline characteristics were similar except for a higher number of validated semesters in the intervention group. Mean acquisition time was shorter in the intervention group (99.4 ± 47.1 s) than in the control group (121.7 ± 52.9 s), with a mean difference of 22.3 s (95% CI 1.2-43.3; p = 0.038). Image quality scores did not differ significantly between groups (16.6 ± 5.0 vs. 18.0 ± 5.0; mean difference - 1.4, 95% CI -3.5-0.7; p = 0.20).
conclusionsStandardized operator positioning at the patient's head was associated with faster acquisition of transcranial Doppler images, without a significant difference in image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.