Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169095›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2026

Signed motif analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network reveals positive feedforward and negative feedback loops.

Gabor S Szilagyi, Attila Gulyas, Zsolt Vassy, Peter Csermely, Bank G Fenyves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabor S SzilagyiDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila GulyasDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt VassyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Peter CsermelyDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Bank G FenyvesDepartment of Molecular Biology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. fenyves.bank@semmelweis.hu.

Funding

Ministry for Innovation and Technology in Hungary TKP2021-EGA-24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNervous systems are complex biological networks with largely unknown structural and functional characteristics. Motif analysis is a robust tool that can reveal the unique aspects of connectivity in a complex network. An ideal candidate for motif analysis is the connectome of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which is the first fully reconstructed nervous system.

resultsWe performed, for the first time, edge polarity-based signed motif analysis on the C. elegans connectome using recent data on the connection signs of this network and a novel structure-preserving randomization method. We identified 56 significantly over- and 1 underrepresented three-node signed motifs and revealed that certain motifs (e.g., positive feedforward, negative feedback, disinhibitory feedback, and incoherent feedforward loops) are overabundant in the C. elegans connectome. We further distinguished nodes by their corresponding neuron modalities (e.g., sensory vs. motor neurons), and found that each significant feedforward and feedback loop has a characteristic neuronal layout.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate the importance and potential of signed motif analysis in understanding biological networks. The motif enumeration tool and definition system we developed can be used to analyze signed motifs in other complex networks.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansConnectomeFeedback, PhysiologicalNerve NetAnimalsNeuronsBiological switchesConnectomeFeedback disinhibitionFeedback inhibitionFeedforward excitationIncoherent feedforward loopTopology-preserving randomization

Identifiers

PMID42169095
PMCPMC13374236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.