ReviewIsrael journal of health policy research2026
The implementation of a national registry for international medical volunteers during armed conflict: the Israeli experience.
Review in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIsrael established the Medical Volunteers for Israel (MVFI) registry to rapidly recruit, license, and integrate international physicians into its health system during emergencies. This study evaluates the registry's design, implementation, and operational outcomes.
methodsA narrative synthesis of registry data was conducted using the MFVI dataset from October 2023 to August 2025. Quantitative analysis characterized physician demographics, specialty distribution, licensing status, and deployment outcomes. A standardized review of hospital needs assessment and licensing protocols was performed to detail the system's replicability.
resultsThe registry enrolled 7,032 international physicians from over 50 countries, with 59% originating from the United States. High-demand specialties included anesthesiology (23% of deployed), emergency medicine (23%), and trauma surgery (12%). Of those registered, 453 physicians were successfully deployed to fill acute staffing gaps. Deployment occurred through a novel, hospital-specific temporary licensing mechanism that bypassed the traditional multi-month observation requirements for senior physicians entering the Israeli workforce. The process, designed to be efficient and similar to that for temporary licenses for visiting specialists, was intended to accelerate approvals and reduce bureaucracy. Although it was finalized before Oct 7, 2023, for earthquake preparedness, recruitment, and final approval occurred only after that date.
conclusionsThe MFVI registry demonstrates that a government-led, need-based integration of international medical personnel is an effective strategy for sustaining healthcare operations during emergencies. While successful in bridging staffing gaps, the model requires robust pre-deployment orientation to overcome language and system barriers. By embedding expertise directly into national infrastructure, this approach offers a scalable alternative to traditional parallel aid models such as emergency medical teams and field hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.