ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Persistence of mechanoreceptors in ACL remnants: a histological and immunohistochemical analysis of 128 patients.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants may retain sensory neural elements after rupture, potentially contributing to proprioceptive function and graft reinnervation following reconstruction. However, the persistence of mechanoreceptors in remnant tissues and the factors influencing their preservation remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of neural structures in ACL remnants using histological and immunohistochemical methods and to determine the association between mechanoreceptor preservation, injury duration, and remnant attachment pattern.
methodsACL remnant tissues were obtained from 128 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Specimens were examined using hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry with S100, myelin basic protein (MBP), and β-III-tubulin antibodies to identify neural elements. Patients were classified according to injury duration as subacute (≤ 3 months), chronic (3-12 months), and late chronic (> 12 months). Remnants were also categorized based on arthroscopic appearance as PCL-femur attachment or tibial stump. Mechanoreceptor presence and distribution were analyzed, and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with mechanoreceptor preservation.
resultsMechanoreceptors or neural structures were identified in 81 of 128 specimens (63.3%). Free nerve endings were the most frequently observed neural elements, whereas structured receptors such as Ruffini or Golgi-like endings were less common and Pacinian corpuscles were rare. Mechanoreceptor prevalence differed significantly according to injury duration, being highest in the subacute group (84.8%) and lower in the chronic (58.7%) and late chronic (53.1%) groups (p = 0.01). The remnant attachment pattern did not show a significant association with mechanoreceptor presence (p = 0.23). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that longer injury duration was independently associated with reduced odds of mechanoreceptor detection.
conclusionsACL remnants frequently retain neural structures, particularly during the early post-injury period, but the prevalence of mechanoreceptors decreases with increasing injury duration. Remnant attachment pattern appears to have a limited influence on neural preservation. These findings support the biological rationale for remnant-preserving reconstruction strategies when technically feasible and highlight the potential importance of early surgical intervention for maintaining proprioceptive tissue integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.