ArticleGenome biology2026
Advancing generative large language models toward discriminative performance in protein function prediction.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing generative large language models toward discriminative performance in protein function prediction.Genome biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile generative large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized diverse research domains through their advanced semantic understanding capabilities, their applications to protein function prediction remain limited. Although significant efforts have been made to develop biological-knowledge-integrated LLMs, current approaches primarily focus on benchmarking their performances against general-purpose foundation models (e.g., ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek-v3) rather than addressing their substantial performance gaps compared to specialized discriminative models (e.g., ESM2, ProtT5-based models).
resultsWe introduce OPUS-PLLM, a multitask generative LLM that establishes a sequence-to-function paradigm through natural language generation. The model integrates three components: modality encoding, modality refinement, and instruction tuning. To support its training, we construct two datasets, OPUS-InstructionCorpus and OPUS-InstructionCorpus-Evol, covering six protein functional annotations. The evaluations across five core protein function prediction tasks (spanning 18 benchmarks) demonstrate that OPUS-PLLM not only outperforms existing biological-knowledge-integrated LLMs but also surpasses specialized discriminative models in most cases.
conclusionsOur results highlight the unexplored potential of LLMs in protein function prediction and provide a robust, scalable, and generalizable solution for developing biological LLMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.