ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurse leaders' appraisal of work-organizational interventions during COVID-19: an interview study in German hospitals and long-term care facilities.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems globally, requiring rapid organizational changes in inpatient care. Nurse leaders played a central role in adapting and implementing work-organizational interventions under challenging conditions. Understanding factors influencing intervention success is essential for building resilient healthcare systems. This study explored nurse leaders' perspectives on the success of work-organizational interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic in German hospitals and long-term care facilities. It examined which interventions were perceived as successful, key implementation facilitators and barriers, and how these related to perceived success.
methodsThis study employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. A qualitative, retrospective study using semi-structured interviews was conducted, supplemented by quantitative organizational data. Fifty-three nurse leaders across strategic, middle, and operational management levels in hospitals and long-term care facilities in the German federal state of Saxony participated. Sampling ensured variation in care settings, ownership types, regions, and pandemic impact. Interviews were guided by a framework for evaluating organizational interventions, focusing on perceptions of intervention success, implementation processes, and context. Data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. In the following, data was transformed into quantitative variables to examine frequencies and statistical associations of variables under investigation.
resultsNurse leaders perceived 36 out of 51 interventions as successful, particularly those addressing infection control, staff scheduling, and teamwork or interprofessional cooperation. Perceived success was facilitated by effective collaboration, leadership support, and staff motivation. Barriers included staffing shortages, infrastructure issues, and psychological strain. Staff acceptance of interventions showed a statistically significant moderate association with perceived success, while internal initiation, nursing staff participation, active leadership role, systematic evaluation, management hierarchy level, and hospital setting were not statistically significant and showed weak or no association.
conclusionsOur results show that nursing staff acceptance is critical for successful intervention implementation during crises. Clear communication, participatory decision-making, and contextual flexibility enhance both acceptance and perceived success. These findings offer practical guidance for strengthening healthcare system resilience in ongoing and future crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.