ArticleBMC public health2026
Iodine levels in household and market salt, and associated knowledge, attitudes, and practices in Ethiopia: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSalt iodization is a key strategy in the global effort to eliminate iodine deficiency disorders. In Ethiopia, iodized salt coverage has fluctuated over the years, potentially linked to consumers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP). This study aimed to evaluate iodine levels in salt samples from households and markets and to assess KAP related to iodized salt consumption.
methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted, collecting 1862 salt samples (931 from households and 931 from markets) from nine regions and two city administrations in Ethiopia. KAP data were collected via a questionnaire-based survey, and iodine concentration in the salt samples was determined using iodometric titration.
resultsThe study found that 88.1% of households consumed adequately iodized salt (≥ 15 ppm), with a mean iodine concentration of 43.9 ppm (95% CI: 42.4, 45.6). Coverage below the recommended level (11.3%) showed significant regional variation, with the lowest coverage observed in Tigray and Afar. Market coverage was slightly higher at 89.1% with a mean iodine concentration of 48.9 ppm (95% CI: 46.1, 49.9). Regarding KAP, 53.1% of women had heard of iodized salt, but awareness of iodine loss from improper storage and handling was low; 56.9% of households reported adding salt after cooking. In multivariable analysis, requesting iodized salt during purchase (AOR = 2.45; 95% CI: 1.82, 3.31), storing salt in a container with a lid (AOR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.45, 2.54), adding salt after cooking (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.33), and having heard of iodized salt (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.76) were independently associated with having adequately iodized household salt.
conclusionEthiopia has high iodized salt coverage at household (88.1%) and market (89.1%) levels, but consumer knowledge and handling practices remain insufficient, risking iodine losses before consumption. The lowest household coverage and iodine concentrations were observed in Tigray and Afar. Public health actions should prioritize region-specific behavior change communication (e.g., low-coverage regions) focused on purchasing iodized salt, airtight storage, and appropriate use during cooking, alongside strengthened quality control in the supply chain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.