ArticleBMC public health2026
Development of a mobile application for screening the risk of premarital sex among adolescents in Northern Thailand.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite existing efforts, premarital sex among Thai adolescents remains a critical public health concern, exacerbated by nearly universal smartphone access and prolonged daily digital exposure. Traditional surveillance often fails to provide the real-time, private intervention needed in this digital era. This research and development (R&D) design aimed to develop a mobile application for screening the risk of premarital sex among adolescents in Northern Thailand.
methodsThis research and development (R&D) study was conducted in three phases: (1) identifying 14 significant factors affecting premarital sex through a comprehensive literature review, (2) developing a mobile application via the Line Official Account platform, and (3) evaluating its diagnostic efficacy using a cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of 773 students (Grades 10-12 and years 1-3 vocational certificate) in Phitsanulok Province, Northern Thailand, recruited through stratified random sampling. Data collection was performed through real-time, self-administered digital assessments within the application. Statistical analyses focused on screening accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC).
resultsThe participants had a mean age of 16.5 years (SD = 1.29). The overall prevalence of premarital sexual experience was 31.3%. Premarital sexual experience was more prevalent among males (33.1%) than females (29.8%), indicating notable sex differences in adolescent risk behavior. The developed application demonstrated high diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 86.4%, specificity of 70.0%, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 87.9%. The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) were 56.6% and 91.8%, respectively, indicating its effectiveness as a real-time screening tool for identifying at-risk adolescents.
conclusionThe 14-factor mobile application was successfully developed and validated, showing high sensitivity and accuracy in screening premarital sex risks among adolescents in Northern Thailand. This digital platform effectively bridges the gap in traditional surveillance by providing a private and real-time assessment tool. Consequently, it is recommended that schools and health providers utilize this application to facilitate early intervention and prevent the long-term consequences of risky sexual behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.