Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42169005›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education in women with dysmenorrhea: controlled clinical trial.

Çiğdem Inkaya, Osman Çoban

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06732778 (Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Women With Menstrual Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06732778 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Women With Menstrual Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUskudar UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled74ConditionsPain Management, Dysmenorrhea (Disorder)ArmsPain Neuroscience Education (PNE), Control Group (CG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Çiğdem InkayaDepartment of Neuroscience, Institute of Health Sciences, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-0076-256X
Osman ÇobanDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Türkiye. osman.coban@uskudar.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-2478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysmenorrhea is a highly prevalent gynecological condition that negatively affects menstrual pain experience, daily activities, and overall quality of life. Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is a non-pharmacological intervention designed to reshape maladaptive pain beliefs and promote a more adaptive understanding of pain mechanisms. This study aimed to examine the effects of PNE on pain beliefs, menstrual pain intensity, and the functional impact of dysmenorrhea among women reporting symptoms consistent with primary dysmenorrhea.

methodsThis prospective controlled clinical trial included 74 women aged ≥18 years who reported dysmenorrhea symptoms consistent with primary dysmenorrhea. Participants were allocated consecutively to either a PNE group (n = 37) or a control group (n = 37). The PNE group received three weekly online educational sessions, whereas the control group continued their routine activities without intervention. The primary outcomes were pain intensity assessed using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and pain-related beliefs assessed using the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ). The secondary exploratory outcome was functional impact assessed using the Scale for Assessing the Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Daily Life (SAIDDL). All outcomes were collected using standardized self-reported online questionnaires before the intervention and during the first menstrual cycle following the intervention.

resultsCompared with the control group, the PNE group showed greater reductions in sensory, affective, and total pain scores on the SF-MPQ. The PNE group also demonstrated greater improvement in psychological pain beliefs, while total PBQ findings were more modest and should be interpreted cautiously. Greater improvement in functional impact was also observed in the PNE group, as reflected by lower SAIDDL scores.

conclusionPNE was associated with short-term improvements in self-reported pain intensity, psychological pain beliefs, and daily functioning in women with dysmenorrhea. These findings suggest that PNE may represent a promising complementary non-pharmacological approach. Future studies with randomized designs, larger samples, and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06732778, Registration date: September 12, 2024.

Indexed as

DysmenorrheaNeurosciencesPatient Education as TopicAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPain MeasurementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDysmenorrheaMenstrual PainPain BeliefsPain Neuroscience EducationWomen’s Health

Identifiers

PMID42169005
PMCPMC13386814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.