ArticleBMC surgery2026
The prognostic nutritional index is an early predictive marker for surgical site infection after spinal fusion surgery: a nested case-control study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for surgical site infection (SSI) following spinal fusion surgery and validate its clinical utility as a simple screening tool.
methodsA retrospective nested case-control study was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery between October 2014 and October 2024. A total of 220 patients with SSI (cases) were matched with 440 SSI-free patients (controls) by age, sex, and calendar year. Preoperative PNI was calculated based on serum albumin concentration and total peripheral blood lymphocyte count. Conditional logistic regression models were used to assess the independent association between PNI and SSI, with subgroup analyses stratified by disease category (degenerative diseases or spinal deformity).
resultsThe proportion of patients with PNI < 50 was significantly higher in cases than in controls (34.5% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.001). Univariate analysis showed that PNI < 50 was associated with an increased SSI risk (OR = 1.794, 95%CI = 1.257-2.562, P = 0.001). After adjusting for confounding factors including diabetes status, estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, drain length, number of surgical levels, surgical region, body mass index, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, PNI < 50 remained an independent predictor of SSI (OR = 1.568, 95%CI = 1.070-2.298, P = 0.021). Subgroup analysis revealed that the predictive value of PNI was significant in patients with degenerative spinal diseases (OR = 1.814, 95%CI = 1.042-3.156, P = 0.035) but not in those with spinal deformity (P > 0.05).
conclusionPreoperative PNI < 50 is an independent early predictive marker for SSI after spinal fusion surgery, particularly in patients with degenerative spinal diseases. Routine PNI assessment can facilitate preoperative risk stratification and individualized infection prevention strategies, improving surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.