ArticleBMC health services research2026
Patient-reported quality of primary care and facility endorsement in Addis Ababa.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-quality primary healthcare is essential for improving health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Facility endorsement-patients' willingness to recommend a health facility-reflects trust and perceived service quality and can provide actionable feedback for quality improvement. This study assessed perceived quality of care and its association with facility endorsement among primary care patients in Addis Ababa.
methodsA mobile-based interactive voice response (IVR) survey was administered to 1,584 patients receiving primary care services from public and private health facilities in Addis Ababa. Perceived quality of care was assessed across three dimensions: structural quality, provider competence, and patient-centered care. Linear and ordered logit regression models were used to examine associations between quality dimensions and endorsement, and a Chow test assessed structural differences across facility types.
resultsOverall perceptions of care quality were moderate, corresponding to average scores of around 50-60% across all quality dimensions, indicating room for improvement. Average scores across facility types were 55.9% for structural quality, 58.0% for provider competence, and 51.2% for patient-centered care. Private facilities-particularly clinics-consistently outperformed public hospitals and health centers, with 60-70% of patients in private facilities rating quality indicators as "good" or "very good," compared with 40-50% in public facilities. The Chow test confirmed significant differences in patient responses by facility type (χ² = 96.7, p < 0.001). Provider competence was a strong and consistent predictor of facility endorsement across all settings; for example, in private hospitals, a one-unit increase in perceived competence more than doubled the odds of endorsement (OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.42-3.95). Patient-centered care was also positively associated with endorsement across all facility types. Structural quality influenced endorsement only in public hospitals.
conclusionPerceived quality of primary care in Addis Ababa remains moderate, with clear disparities between public and private facilities. Provider competence and patient-centered care are the strongest drivers of patient endorsement, highlighting the importance of clinical skills, communication, and respectful care as key factors associated with patient endorsement. In public hospitals, addressing structural gaps through targeted investments in infrastructure, medicines, and diagnostics remains important for improving patient experience and may contribute to broader system performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.