ArticleBMC health services research2026
Stakeholder insights into hospital-home transitions for older adults in a decentralised health system: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital-home transitions are critical points in the care trajectory for older adults, requiring alignment between clinical decision-making, communication, and home-based support to maintain care continuity. In decentralised health systems, where responsibilities are distributed across multiple providers, these transitions may be vulnerable to fragmentation. Although transitional care has been studied, little is known about how it unfolds in decentralised, mixed-provider systems, where accountability is distributed across providers. This study constitutes the contextual inquiry phase of a Medical Research Council-guided intervention development programme and explores how hospital-home transitions are experienced and enacted in a decentralised Swiss region.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study in southern Switzerland involving 26 participants. Data were generated through two focus groups with hospital-based professionals (n = 18) and seven semistructured interviews with community stakeholders. These included general practitioners, public and private home-care providers, self-employed nurses, one patient, and one family caregiver. Topic guides were informed by international discharge standards and Transitions theory constructs. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed via reflexive thematic analysis, combining inductive coding with deductive sensitising concepts from Transitions theory. Reporting follows COREQ.
resultsFive interrelated themes described hospital-home transitions as fragile and often sustained through ad hoc support: (1) fragile communication pathways marked by inconsistent and person-dependent information flows; (2) medication safety as a systemic fault line, with frequent discrepancies between hospital and home regimens; (3) diffuse accountability and uneven bridging roles, whereby coordination relied on discretionary efforts; (4) families compensating for coordination gaps; and (5) practices that supported smoother transitions, including early discharge planning, proactive liaison roles, and structured information tools.
conclusionsAcross stakeholder groups, continuity of care was maintained through informal coordination by professionals and families. Strengthening hospital-home transitions may require more reliable discharge communication routines, clearer medication processes, and more structured involvement of family caregivers and community providers. These findings, drawn mainly from professional perspectives, can inform the co-design of transitional care improvements tailored to the local context.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.