SynthesisBMC public health2026
Resilience of adolescents and young adults towards climate-related stressors - a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClimate change represents an increasing source of stress for adolescents and young adults, contributing to higher risks of anxiety and impaired mental health.
methodsThis systematic review synthesizes current evidence on resilience to climate-related stressors among individuals aged 10-25 years. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, and from the Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) (PROSPERO: CRD42025644668) identified 6,975 individual references.
resultsTen studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies, conducted across high-income countries (e.g. USA, Germany, Australia), Asian LMICs (Thailand, Nepal), and sub-Saharan African countries with high climate and health vulnerability (e.g., South Africa, Uganda), comprised 9,439 participants with approximately equal gender distribution. Methodological designs included qualitative (n = 2), quantitative (n = 4), and mixed-method (n = 4). Quantitative studies applied standardized resilience scales (e.g., BRS, CYRM-R) or related constructs such as coping, self-efficacy, and disaster preparedness. Using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, 70% of studies were rated as high quality. Five interconnected protective domains were identified: connection to culture, community, and nature; supportive social networks; youth agency and engagement; education and preparedness; and psychological skills. Gender and prior disaster experience appeared as vulnerability factors. None of the included studies provided a clear definition of resilience, highlighting a conceptual gap in the current literature. Overall, resilience among young people appears as a dynamic, socially embedded process shaped by psychosocial and ecological systems.
conclusionsEducational and participatory interventions integrating climate literacy, emotional regulation, and collective action show promise for strengthening climate resilience and mental well-being among youth. Future research should develop climate-specific resilience measures and evaluate intervention outcomes across diverse socioecological settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.