Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Characteristics and outcomes of younger adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide study.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown promise in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, but evidence in younger adults remains limited. Younger adults represent a unique subgroup with distinct etiologies and potentially greater physiological reserve. This study aimed to identify clinical characteristics and assess factors associated with outcomes in younger adults receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
methodsThis retrospective observational study analyzed data from the Study of Advanced Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan registry, which prospectively collected data on adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation across 36 Japanese institutions (2013-2018). Patients were stratified by age: younger adults (≤ 40 years) versus older adults (> 40 years). The primary outcome was favorable neurological status at discharge (cerebral performance category 1-2). Multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were performed to identify factors associated with outcomes.
resultsOf 2,129 patients, 212 (10.0%) were younger adults (mean age, 32.2 ± 6.8 years) and 1,917 (90.0%) were older adults (mean age, 62.2 ± 11.1 years). Younger adults showed distinct etiological patterns with fewer acute coronary syndromes (13.7% vs. 53.4%) and more arrhythmias (30.2% vs. 9.8%) and myocarditis/cardiomyopathy (13.7% vs. 4.9%). Notably, the proportion of cases with unknown causes was higher among younger adults (40.6%) compared to older adults (18.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed that shockable rhythm was not associated with neurological outcomes in younger adults, in contrast to older adults where shockable rhythm retained its prognostic significance. Nonlinear spline analysis showed that the odds of favorable neurological outcomes remained relatively stable in younger adults despite prolonged low-flow durations, in contrast to older adults who showed deteriorating outcomes with longer ischemic periods.
conclusionsYounger adults undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation demonstrated distinct etiological patterns and enhanced tolerance to prolonged low-flow time relative to older adults. These findings generate the hypothesis that age-related differences in tolerance to prolonged low-flow time may exist between younger and older adults. However, given the observational and post-hoc nature of this study, prospective validation is needed before age-stratified extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocols can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.