ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic multi-strategy Grey Wolf optimizer and its applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the shortcomings of the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) in solution accuracy, convergence speed, and search capability, this paper proposes a Dynamic Multi-Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer (DMSGWO). Based on GWO, DMSGWO introduces four improvement strategies. First, a nonlinear convergence factor strategy is adopted to better balance global exploration and local exploitation. Second, a population dynamic grouping strategy is employed to dynamically adjust the population sizes of exploration and exploitation groups during the iteration process. Third, a random position update strategy is applied to the exploration group to enhance the global exploration capability. Finally, an adaptive perturbation position update strategy is applied to the exploitation group to improve the local exploitation capability. To comprehensively evaluate the performance of DMSGWO, it is compared with GWO, four other swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, and four other improved GWO algorithms on 23 benchmark test functions and the CEC2022 test suite. The comparative results demonstrate that DMSGWO exhibits excellent solution accuracy, stability, and convergence speed. Further validation through Friedman ranking tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirms that DMSGWO ranks first in overall performance. The test results show statistically significant performance differences from the other algorithms on most test functions, and further verify the superior performance of DMSGWO. To validate the practical application value of DMSGWO, it is applied to two typical engineering design optimization problems and WSN coverage optimization problem alongside the comparative algorithms. The results show that DMSGWO can effectively handle constraints and achieve the best objective values. Thus, these results demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of DMSGWO in solving real-world complex application problems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.