Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168703›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2026

Using machine learning to uncover joint involvement patterns linked to disease activity and disability in rheumatoid arthritis.

Sina Bazmi, Aref Andishgar, Parisa Zare, Parsa Farjam, Sedighe Hooshmandi, Najiebeh Sekhavati, Mitra Abbasifard, Reza Tabrizi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sina BazmiUSERN Office, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2128-0924
Aref AndishgarNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran.
Parisa ZareStudent Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Parsa FarjamFaculté Des Sciences d'Orsay, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Sedighe HooshmandiMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Najiebeh SekhavatiCollege of Engineering and Technology (CET), American University in the Emirates (AUE), Intel Academic City, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mitra AbbasifardDepartment of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran. dr.mabbasifard@gmail.com.
Reza TabriziNoncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran. kmsrc89@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-3948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease marked by painful, progressive joint damage that leads to disability and a significant socioeconomic burden. Given the growing interest in data-driven healthcare, this study applied machine learning (ML) techniques to identify patterns of joint involvement associated with greater disease activity and functional impairment in patients with RA.

methodIn this cross-sectional study, 936 individuals with RA were assessed using demographic and clinical data, along with detailed joint examinations, including tenderness, swelling, and limitation of motion. Multiple ML models, including random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), k-nearest neighbors, CatBoost (CAT), and LightGBM, were evaluated to predict disease severity and disability. Disease activity and disability were measured using Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) scores, respectively.

resultsFor disability prediction, the XGB model performed best (F1 score, 0.60; AUC, 0.85), while the CAT model showed the highest performance for disease activity classification (F1 score, 0.63; AUC, 0.81). Key joint features associated with higher disability included the knee, wrist, acromioclavicular joint, and several hand joints. In contrast, high disease activity was primarily linked to tenderness and swelling in the knee and small hand joints.

conclusionOverall, involvement of the knee, wrist, shoulder, and small hand joints was associated with functional disability, whereas disease activity was mainly reflected in the knee and hand joint involvement. These findings emphasize the importance of recognizing specific joint involvement patterns to improve clinical assessment and guide treatment strategies in RA. Key Points • This study is the first to apply machine learning to comprehensively evaluate joint-specific patterns of involvement and their association with both functional disability and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. • Large joints, particularly the knee, wrist, and shoulder, were identified as the strongest determinants of significant functional disability, alongside key small hand joints involved in grip and fine motor function. • High disease activity was primarily driven by small hand joints (especially MCP and PIP joints), with additional contributions from selected large joints such as the knee, wrist, and acromioclavicular joint. • These findings highlight the clinical value of detailed joint-level assessment beyond traditional composite scores, supporting more targeted and personalized management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidJointsMachine LearningAdultAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSeverity of Illness IndexDisabilityJointRheumatoid arthritisSeverity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.