Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168696›Full record

ArticleJournal of digestive diseases

Real-World Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients and Symptom Outcomes in Patients With Reflux Esophagitis in China: A Prospective, Non-Interventional Study (VIEW).

Ying Lian Xiao, Hui Yang, Yi Xia Lu, Li Yang, Guo Xin Zhang, Guo Liang Ye, Qi Song, Li Xie, Min Hu Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digestive diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04501627 (A Multi-center, Single-arm, Prospective, Non-interventional Study on Vonoprazan in the Real-world Clinical Practice in China), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04501627 completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Single-arm, Prospective, Non-interventional Study on Vonoprazan in the Real-world Clinical Practice in China

TypeobservationalSponsorTakedaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled3,000ConditionsEsophagitis Peptic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ying Lian XiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Hui YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.
Yi Xia LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Li YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-9342
Guo Xin ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Guo Liang YeDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Qi SongChina Medical Team, Takeda (China) International Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Li XieChina Medical Team, Takeda (China) International Trade Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3886-1948
Min Hu ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China.

Funding

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVonoprazan was approved in China for reflux esophagitis (RE) in 2019; however, its real-world safety and effectiveness remain undetermined. We aimed to evaluate the safety of vonoprazan in patients and its effectiveness in patients with RE in a real-world setting.

methodsIn this prospective, non-interventional, real-world study, vonoprazan 20 mg was administered orally daily for 4 or 8 weeks. Primary endpoints were incidence rates of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Secondary endpoints included proportions of patients with RE without typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (complete symptom relief) at baseline and Week 4, relief of heartburn/regurgitation symptoms (all day/nighttime) during Week 1, and mean change in GERD Questionnaire (GERDQ) score at Week 4.

resultsOf the 2829 patients with safety data, 488 (17.2%) reported ≥ 1 AE; 29 (1.0%) reported ≥ 1 SAE; and 129 (4.6%) reported ≥ 1 ADR. Of 1796 patients with RE and effectiveness data, the proportion without typical symptoms of GERD increased from 20.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.29-22.05) at baseline to 55.2% (95% CI 52.63-57.79) at Week 4 (change: 35.1%, 95% CI 31.95-38.25). Complete relief from heartburn, nighttime heartburn, regurgitation, and nighttime regurgitation was observed in 32.3% (314/971), 43.8% (427/975), 27.0% (262/971), and 40.5% (395/976) patients, respectively, during Week 1. Mean change in GERDQ score (n = 1464) improved by Week 4 (-1.70).

conclusionVonoprazan is well tolerated through 8 weeks in patients and improves symptoms in patients with RE in the real-world setting in China (VIEW; NCT04501627).

Indexed as

Esophagitis, PepticProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesAdultAgedChinaFemaleHeartburnHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesvonoprazanesophagitis, pepticgastroesophageal reflux diseasepotassium competitive acid blockersvonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID42168696
PMCPMC13281756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.