Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168666›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2026

The influence of different skeletal patterns on TMJ anatomy: a comprehensive CBCT study across various sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in adults.

Sara Eslami, Babak Sayahpour, Ali Tashakor, Elnaz Tavazozadeh, Ari Harsoputranto, Anand Marya, Abdolreza Jamilian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara EslamiDepartment of Orthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany. sara.eslami.sh@gmail.com.
Babak SayahpourDepartment of Orthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Medicine (Carolinum), Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ali TashakorOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Elnaz TavazozadehDepartment of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ari HarsoputrantoOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Anand MaryaOrthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Abdolreza JamilianThe City of London Dental School, University of Great Manchester, Bolton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns as well as gender on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) morphology using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted on CBCT scans of 126 adult patients (63 females, 63 males) aged 20 to 40 years, stratified into Class I, II and III sagittal classifications and further divided by vertical patterns: horizontal, normal and vertical. Measurements included condylar dimensions (length, height, and width) and glenoid fossa dimensions (depth and width). Left and right TMJs were assessed and average values were used due to the absence of significant side differences. A multiple linear regression model was used to examine the effects of sagittal and vertical patterns and Gender on the parameter. Gender was included as a covariate in all models. Both an interaction model (vertical × sagittal pattern) and a main-effects-only model were considered with interaction effects accounted for where present. Model selection was based on statistical significance and model fit criteria. Pairwise comparisons were conducted using Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) test and estimated marginal means (EMMs) were calculated where applicable. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 with adjustments for multiple comparisons.

resultsFor Condyle Height, a significant difference was found between Class III and Class I within the vertical pattern (VP) subgroup (p = 0.011). In contrast, Gender significantly influenced Condyle Length (p = 0.009) and a significant difference was found between Class II and Class I (p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference between Class II and Class I in the VP group (p = 0.023). For Condyle Width, a significant interaction between VP and Class III was found (p = 0.029). Significant pairwise differences were observed between HP-Class II and VP-Class III (p = 0.023), NP-Class II and VP-Class III (p = 0.007), and HP-Class III and VP-Class III (p = 0.013). Within the NP subgroup, Class II differed significantly from Class I (p = 0.044). Analysis of Glenoid Fossa Width revealed a significant interaction between NP and Class III (p = 0.048). Multiple significant pairwise differences were identified, including NP-Class I versus HP-Class II (p = 0.002), NP-Class I versus NP-Class II (p = 0.004), and VP-Class II versus HP-Class III (p = 0.004). Regarding glenoid fossa depth, a significant interaction between VP and Class III was found (p = 0.037), but no pairwise subgroup differences reached statistical significance (all p > 0.05).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that TMJ morphology is variably influenced by vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns and gender. Significant differences in condyle length and width as well as glenoid fossa width were primarily observed in individuals with vertical patterns and Class II or III skeletal relationships. Gender significantly affected condyle length. While glenoid fossa depth showed a high interaction between vertical pattern and sagittal skeletal relationships, no individual comparisons reached statistical significance. These findings underscore the nuanced interplay of sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns in shaping TMJ morphology.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyTemporomandibular JointAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMandibular CondyleSex FactorsYoung AdultCone-beam computed tomographyMalocclusionOrthodonticsSkeletal classificationsSkeletal patternsTMJ anatomy

Identifiers

PMID42168666
PMCPMC13194248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.