ArticleScientific reports2026
Vision based feedback control of weatherstrip coextrusion with predictive dimension modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving geometric accuracy in weatherstrip co-extrusion is inherently challenging due to the complex nonlinear interactions among process variables and the significant time delay caused by the long vulcanization line. However, conventional approaches primarily focus on managing process parameters or fail to integrate dimensional inspection into closed-loop feedback systems. Therefore, an integrated control framework is required to regulate product dimensions while simultaneously accounting for complex process variables. This study proposes a data-driven control strategy comprising two models to manage both process initialization and steady-state production. For the startup phase, a Random Forest-based prediction model was developed to determine optimal initial screw speeds, effectively minimizing trial-and-error adjustments. For steady-state operation, a smart vision-based feedback framework utilizing an artificial neural network was implemented to proactively compensate for dimensional deviations despite transport delays. Field validation in a mass-production environment confirmed that the system successfully maintained dimensional errors within a strict tolerance range of - 0.1 to + 0.2 mm. These results demonstrate the practical feasibility of this integrated approach for autonomous quality management in industrial weatherstrip co-extrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.