ArticleArchives of virology2026
Detection and complete genome characterisation of bat coronaviruses from Ghana.
Article in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alphacoronaviruses comprise human, livestock, and wildlife coronaviruses of importance, particularly to the livestock industry worldwide. Domestic livestock have the potential to serve as intermediate hosts of coronaviruses, given the contact they have with both humans and wildlife. With the aim of detection and subsequent complete genome sequencing of novel and known but previously undetected alphacoronaviruses, a screening RT-PCR assay was established. In vitro transcripts of two human alphacoronaviruses were generated to evaluate assay performance, and a collection of archived bat and livestock viral RNA samples was tested as part of assay validation. Confirmation of RT-PCR-positive outcomes was done by Sanger and high-throughput sequencing, before phylogenetic analysis. The assay can detect both human alphacoronaviruses with a detection limit of 46 copies/reaction of Alphacoronavirus amsterdamense and 504 copies/reaction of Alphacoronavirus chicagoense in vitro transcripts, as estimated by a probit regression analysis. Validation screening of domestic and peri-domestic livestock species, including cattle, sheep, goats, donkeys, pigs, rabbits, and grasscutters, did not yield any positive outcomes. Confirmed detections were made in bats (3.11%), comprising 1.84% alphacoronaviruses and 1.27% betacoronaviruses. Two complete genomes were obtained for an Alphacoronavirus chicagoense-related bat coronavirus and a putative member of the subgenus Hibecovirus. A near-complete genome was obtained for a Chaerephon spp. bat alphacoronavirus, which was found to be most closely related to a similar virus from Nigeria. This study presents a sensitive assay for coronavirus surveillance and provides additional complete genomes, thereby enhancing our understanding of coronavirus diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.