ArticleScientific reports2026
A global survey of systems biology-based predictions of gene-rare disease associations to enhance new diagnoses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In rare disease diagnosis, described genotype-phenotype associations are evaluated first. In the absence of strong evidence, WES and WGS provide hundred to million other genetic variants, most poorly annotated, that need to be prioritized. While several in silico approaches leverage existing gene-disease knowledge to predict novel associations, doing so in isolation can hide how different genes are represented across other predictions. We hypothesize that a global perspective, accounting for differences in the knowledge accumulated in the gene collections, can refine predictions. Using a network-based algorithm, we explored functional neighborhoods of known disease-associated genes to predict novel candidates for over 200 rare and other Mendelian diseases. A global analysis of gene and protein family behavior across predictions identified genes and functions broadly associated with multiple conditions, 192 genes linked to a single disease and 251 genes functionally associated with specific classes of genetic diseases. These findings are integrated into a gene-disease specificity score, aimed at enhancing variant prioritization and guiding geneticists in advancing candidate genes toward functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.