ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable zero-day attack detection in IoMT using transformer-based time-series modeling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Securing Internet of Things (IoT) and Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) networks necessitates intrusion detection systems (IDS) robust against severe class imbalance, zero-day attacks, and deployment constraints. Prior methodologies often rely on heavy feature engineering, stacking ensembles, or data augmentation for rebalancing; yet they remain inherently closed-set and brittle across heterogeneous datasets, thereby limiting calibrated performance in real-world environments. To overcome these limitations, we propose a paradigm shift toward protocol-aware sequence modeling and principled open-set calibration. We introduce a Protocol State-Masked, Multi-scale Transformer that directly incorporates finite-state protocol constraints into the self-attention mechanism. This core architecture is augmented by two auxiliary heads (next-state prediction and violation scoring) and an energy-based open-set module calibrated using Extreme Value Theory. To rigorously verify generalization rather than simple memorization, we train the model on a heterogeneous IoMT benchmark (CICIoMT2024) and evaluate it on a completely held-out, independent testbed (WUSTL-EHMS-2020). On CICIoMT2024, the model achieves 99.62% accuracy and 99.30% macro-F1 (binary classification), and 98.90% accuracy with 98.40% macro-F1 (19-class classification). In zero-day settings, it attains an AUROC-OOD of 0.975 with an FPR@95%TPR of 7.8%. Crucially, on the unseen WUSTL-EHMS-2020 dataset, the model demonstrates strong cross-dataset transfer, reaching ≈ 99.6% overall accuracy with a balanced TPR/TNR of ≈ 99.6%. Ablation studies confirm that both the protocol masking and the auxiliary heads significantly sharpen decision boundaries, substantially reduce false alarms, and improve minority-class balance when compared to data-only Transformer variants and conventional ensembles. Our design effectively mitigates imbalance (via multi-resolution windows, class-aware objectives, and protocol-conditioned learning) and curbs overfitting (through structural supervision and calibrated open-set thresholds), delivering a calibrated, high-fidelity detection system that generalizes across diverse datasets while remaining practical for deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.