ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Machine learning based hepatic safety score predicts decompensation in hepatocellular carcinoma systemic therapy.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) frequently coexists with portal hypertension, significantly increasing the risk of hepatic decompensation (HD) and variceal bleeding during systemic therapy. We developed a machine learning based hepatic safety score (MHSS) using data from 2026 patients with unresectable HCC to predict clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and prognosis. A random forest model was trained in a derivation cohort (n = 1262) and validated in an independent cohort (n = 764). The MHSS demonstrated robust performance (AUROC 0.840) in CSPH and predicting HD. Stratification revealed that high MHSS patients faced significantly elevated risks of HD (HR 3.25), variceal bleeding (VB, HR 4.90), and mortality (HR 2.21). Crucially, while atezolizumab-bevacizumab offered a survival advantage in low MHSS patients, it was associated with high bleeding risk and no survival benefit in the high MHSS group compared to other regimens. A simulation of MHSS guided treatment selection demonstrated a 24% reduction in HD, a 40% reduction in VB, and a 26% reduction in mortality. In conclusion, the MHSS effectively predicts CSPH, decompensation, and survival in patients with HCC prior to systemic therapy. By enabling individualized risk stratification, the MHSS may guide personalized treatment selection between bevacizumab-containing and alternative regimens, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.