Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168507›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026

Lattice-tip dual energy ablation creates effective ventricular lesions through transmural scar that might inadvertently increase lead capture thresholds on the opposing surface.

Vishal Luther, Laura Brodie, Justin Chiong, Peter Calvert, Daniel Walker, Dhiraj Gupta, Nathan Denham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vishal LutherLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK. vishal.luther@lhch.nhs.uk.
Laura BrodieLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK.
Justin ChiongLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK.
Peter CalvertLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK.
Daniel WalkerMedtronic, Medtronic LTD, Watford, UK.
Dhiraj GuptaLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK.
Nathan DenhamLiverpool Heart & Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchieving adequate lesion depth during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation within scar is challenging with conventional radiofrequency energy (RF). The lattice-tip catheter enables dual-energy ablation (RF & pulsed field [PF]) with enhanced tissue penetration.

objectiveWe report on 3 cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) patients with transmural apical left ventricular (LV) scars and drug-refractory VT. Each underwent endocardial LV ablation using RF & stacked PF. Ablation included delivery near the opposing surface of CIED leads, at sites critical for the VT circuit. CIED parameters were assessed pre- and post-procedure, as well as at interval follow-up.

resultsVT was eliminated with complete non-inducibility achieved in all cases, and there has been no recurrence at early follow-up (4-6months). However, each case demonstrated inadvertent CIED lead capture threshold rise (apical right ventricular x2, anterolateral LV coronary sinus branch x1), with partial recovery over time. Findings correlated with ablation near opposing lead electrodes.

conclusionDual-energy lattice-tip ablation creates effective ventricular lesions through transmural scar that may increase CIED capture thresholds on the opposing myocardial surface. Our report recommends vigilance during ablation opposing CIED leads, balancing the respective wall thickness and potential for lead damage against the gravity of the arrhythmic presentation.

Indexed as

AblationDevice lead thresholdLatticePulsed fieldRadiofrequencyScarTissue depthVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID42168507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.