ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Soutien à la parentalité: mise en œuvre et évaluation d'Hélys 12-17 ans, un programme universel novateur destiné aux parents d'adolescents.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
locationHélys 12-17 years old was created in response to the lack of universal-access Québec programs offering support to parents of adolescents.
interventionThe program provides parents with conferences, podcasts, and infographics on four themes related to adolescence (adolescence 101, digital age, love and friendships, interests and career orientation).
methodThe assessment of the program's initial implementation and its effects on parents was documented through focus group interviews with 12 facilitators, individual interviews with 11 parents, and questionnaires administered to 24 parents before and after the end of the program. YouTube analytics were also used to track engagement with the podcasts.
resultsParticipants appreciated the program, particularly the opportunities for discussion and sharing. Their feedback highlights several factors that facilitated or hindered participation, including the schedule, the location, and the virtual format of the conferences. Statistically, the results show significant improvements in parents' sense of efficacy, but no changes in autonomy support or in the quality of the parent-adolescent relationship. Nonetheless, parents reported feeling valued and said they had adjusted certain practices to better communicate with their teenager and support their autonomy. IMPLICATION: After evaluation, the program is considered promising, and modifications to the conference content and program modalities are being made to better meet parents' needs and encourage their participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42168504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.