ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable machine learning framework for analyzing and predicting mental health problems among university students in Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health problems (MHPs) among university students are an increasing public health concern globally, including in Bangladesh. While machine learning (ML) methods can capture complex patterns in mental health data, their application to non-probability, cross-sectional student samples requires cautious interpretation. This study applies an exploratory explainable ML framework to examine patterns of depression, anxiety, and stress within a high-symptom sample of Bangladeshi university students. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 424 students during a period of significant social and political unrest in July 2024. Within the study sample, high proportions of moderate-to-extremely severe symptoms were observed for depression (66.0%), anxiety (73.4%), and stress (52.4%), with substantial symptom overlap (48.1% meeting criteria for all three). Eight ML models were evaluated using repeated train-test splits and cross-validation. Support vector machine (SVM) models showed relatively stable performance for depression and stress prediction, while XGBoost demonstrated comparatively stronger discriminative ability for anxiety within the sample. Explainable ML analyses using SHAP and LIME indicated that features related to sleep disturbance, cognitive complaints, and self-reported behavioral difficulties contributed prominently to model predictions across outcomes. Academic discipline and internet addiction severity were more influential in anxiety-related predictions, whereas gender and university type showed greater relevance in depression-related models. The primary contribution of this study is methodological and exploratory, not predictive or clinical. These feature contributions reflect model behavior and overlapping symptom dimensions rather than independent or causal risk factors. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using explainable ML approaches for exploratory pattern recognition in student mental health data under exceptional contextual conditions, providing a transparent framework, benchmark performance metrics, and a methodological template for future research. The findings are exploratory and sample-specific and should not be interpreted as population-level prevalence estimates or deployable prediction tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.