Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42168463›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Assessing and mitigating traffic crash risks using interpretable machine learning techniques.

Adnan Yousaf, Jianping Wu, Deqing Huang, Muhammad Zahid, Muhammad Faisal Habib, Amjad Pervez, Muhammad Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adnan YousafSchool of Electrical Engineering, SouthWest Jiatong University, Chengdu, 611756, China.
Jianping WuSchool of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Deqing HuangSchool of Electrical Engineering, SouthWest Jiatong University, Chengdu, 611756, China. elehd@home.swjtu.edu.cn.
Muhammad ZahidSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia (Okanagan Campus), Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada.
Muhammad Faisal HabibUpper Great Plains Transportation Institute (UGPTI), North Dakota State University (NDSU), Fargo, 58108, USA.
Amjad PervezInstitute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, College of Mechatronics and Control Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
Muhammad HussainWestern Australian Centre for Road Safety Research, School of Psychological Science, M304, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to examine factors associated with self-reported crash involvement among drivers in Pakistan using interpretable machine learning (ML) techniques and established driver-behavior instruments. The data used in this study were collected through an Internet-based survey in Pakistan utilizing a self-report questionnaire (cross-sectional design; N:623 drivers). The questionnaire consisted of items related to dangerous (aggressive, risky, and negative emotions), aberrant (errors and violations), and positive driving behaviors, along with demographics and items related to self-reported crashes (Yes/No) over the past three years. Interpretable ML techniques, including Logistic Regression, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were employed. Furthermore, to improve the interpretation of ML techniques for self-reported crash risk factors, the Shapley Additive explanation (SHAP) technique was used. The results revealed that aggressive driving and risky driving behaviors, errors, and violations committed while driving, were associated with increased traffic crashes. Prior motorcycle riding experience variable also had a significant association with the occurrence of traffic crashes. Moreover, XGBoost outperformed the CatBoost and Logistic Regression models in terms of predictive performance. XGBoost achieved the highest test accuracy (0.86), compared to CatBoost (0.80) and Logistic Regression (0.73). The study underscores the importance of integrating interpretable ML in traffic safety research. The findings suggest that behavior-oriented road safety interventions such as aggressive and risky driving enforcement, driver education, and risk perception should be prioritized and enhanced. Prior motorcycle-riding experience is important, transition-oriented training should be designed for riders to adapt vehicle characteristics and road usage patterns.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAutomobile DrivingMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePakistanPredictive Learning ModelsRisk FactorsRisk-TakingSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesCatBoostDriving behaviorsMachine learningSHAPTraffic crashesXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42168463
PMCPMC13507384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.