ArticleScientific reports2026
Mitigating errors in satellite solar irradiation using a sequential empirical-ANN model for four cities across Central and Northern Pakistan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) is essential for optimizing solar energy utilization. Satellite-based datasets often overestimate GHI, leading to errors that hinder reliable solar resource assessment. This study presents a sequential modeling approach combining newly developed empirical models with artificial neural networks (ANN) to reduce errors in satellite-derived GHI for four cities in Pakistan: Bahawalpur, Islamabad, Lahore, and Peshawar. First 6 empirical models were developed for each city, and then the output of the best model for each city was incorporated into the ANN model. Ground-measured data from the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) and satellite data from NASA's Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources (POWER) database were used. Using meteorological parameters such as temperature, humidity, precipitation, clearness index, and day number, empirical models were formulated, and their outputs fed into ANN models. The sequential Empirical-ANN (SE-ANN) model achieved mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) ranging from 5.86% in Bahawalpur to 17.09% in Lahore, outperforming satellite data, which achieved a maximum MAPE of 25.30%. Root mean square errors (RMSE) and Mean absolute error (MAE) decreased significantly, with values as low as 0.43 kWh/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.